Team:StanfordBrownSpelman/Amberless Hell Cell

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 114: Line 114:
   Results go here.
   Results go here.
   </h6>
   </h6>
 +
 +
<!-- ===== Figure ===== -->
 +
</div></div>
 +
<div class="small-8 small-centered columns"><br><center><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/01/SBS_AmberlessResults_Plates.png"><br>
 +
<h6><center><b>Figure #.</b> Figure caption here.</center></h6>
 +
  </div>
 +
<div class="row">
 +
  <div id="subheader" class="small-8 small-centered columns"> 
 +
 +
<!-- ===== end figure ==== -->
 +
 +
<h6>More results here.
 
 
  
  

Revision as of 23:54, 15 October 2014

Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014 — Amberless Hell Cell

Approach & Methods
Methods here.


Image description goes here.
More methods here.


Image description goes here.

Results
Results go here.


Figure #. Figure caption here.
More results here.
References
1. Lajoie MJ et al. (2013) Genomically Recoded Organisms Impart New Biological Functions. Science 342: 357-60. PMID: 24136966.

2. Thorbjarnardóttir, S. et al. (1985) Leucine tRNA family of Escherichia coli: nucleotide sequence of the supP(Am) suppressor gene. J. Bacteriol. 161: 219–22. PMID: 2981802.
Additional Information
Read about how our submitted Amberless Hell Cell idea was used as a government regulatory case study on synthetic biology. We then began a conversation with Dr. Mark Segal at the EPA about the regulation and safety of the use of engineered bacteria in the environment.

Submitted biobricks: We submitted 9 biobricks for this sub-project. Six of these bricks include parts that can enable other teams to use the Amberless chassis as a system for more responsible synthetic biology.
Built atop Foundation. Content &amp Development © Stanford–Brown–Spelman iGEM 2014.