Team:Paris Saclay/Outreach/Events/Curiositas

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Curiositas)
(Curiositas)
Line 4: Line 4:
<br />
<br />
-
Curiositas, held in Orsay, was an art and science festival that took place on October 4th to 9th. During a dynamic and constructive debate about bioart and bioethics, our team talked with Marion Laval-Jeantet, artist and promoter of the festival, the Parisian iGEM teams (Paris Bettencourt and Evry teams) and the audience. The debate was facilitated by a mediator, Alexandre Peluffo, biologist and ethics student.
+
Curiositas, held at Orsay, is art-and-science festival that took place on October 4th to 9th. During an interactive debate named "BioArt in the light of ethics", our teams talked with Marion Laval-Jeantet, artist and promoter of the festival, the Parisian iGEM teams (Paris Bettencourt and Evry teams) and the audience. The debate was facilitated by a mediator, Alexandre Peluffo, biologist and ethics student.
[[File:Paris_Saclay_curiositas2.JPG|200px|center|]]
[[File:Paris_Saclay_curiositas2.JPG|200px|center|]]
 +
  Every IGEM team described their projects and Marion Laval-Jeantet went back over her bioart project: she has injected herself with horse blood plasma. The ultimate goal is to explore trans-species relationships: the project was more artistic and sentimental-oriented than pure science applications. The theoretical part was done on a French lab for purification of horse blood and separation of all immunoglobulins. She prepared her body to accept different horse immunoglobulins over the course of several months before the real injection of horse blood plasma. This project was a success and this experience has provided data for many studies on immunoglobulin use in medicine.
-
Every IGEM team described their projects and Marion Laval-Jeantet went back over her artistic project : she has injected herself with horse blood plasma. The ultimate goal was to explore trans-species relationships: the project was more artistic and sentiment-oriented than purely scientific. Initially, the blood  came from a panda to have a critically endangered species in her body, but it was controversial because all panda related projects require the authorization of the Chinese government. The theoretical part was done in a French lab to purify horse blood and separate all immunoglobulins. She prepared her body to accept different horse immunoglobulins over the course of several months before the real injection of horse blood plasma. This in vivo part cannot be made in France, because the European Union has a strong legislation on experiments using animal-based products in human medicine and other areas like art, this part was made in Switzerland. This project was a success and this experiment provided data for many studies on immunoglobulin use in medicine.
+
One of the questions in the debate was the definition of life. The subject was introduced by a quote from biologist François Jacob "There are no life in labs". Marion Laval-Jeantet expressed two things: first, definition of life is at the center of bioartists' work. Secondly, different artists' visions create different definitions. So there is not a consensual definition of live nowadays. Other aspects of life definition were more developed on our Ethics part.
 +
[[File:Paris Saclay curiostias3.JPG|300px|center|]]
-
One of the questions of the debate was the definition of life. The subject was introduced by a quote from biologist François Jacob "There is no life in labs". This definition is the center of artistic work, Marion Laval-Jeantet said, and different artists' visions create different definitions. Other views of our ethic reflection were brought up, which allowed us to collect complementary viewpoints from different participants and from the public's questions.
+
Another developed point concerned relations between humans and other living beings. Some participants said that ethical committees unconsciously used an artificial hierarchy of living beings: some of them are placed before others without any biological or scientific basis. An explanation would be of psychological order: we feel closer to animals than bacteria because animals can react to stimuli and show reactions which can be similar to human feelings. We thus set up a better legislation to protect animals.
-
 
+
-
[[File:Paris Saclay curiostias3.JPG|300px|center|]]
+
{{Team:Paris_Saclay/default_footer}}
{{Team:Paris_Saclay/default_footer}}

Revision as of 02:55, 18 October 2014

Curiositas


Curiositas, held at Orsay, is art-and-science festival that took place on October 4th to 9th. During an interactive debate named "BioArt in the light of ethics", our teams talked with Marion Laval-Jeantet, artist and promoter of the festival, the Parisian iGEM teams (Paris Bettencourt and Evry teams) and the audience. The debate was facilitated by a mediator, Alexandre Peluffo, biologist and ethics student.
Paris Saclay curiositas2.JPG
 Every IGEM team described their projects and Marion Laval-Jeantet went back over her bioart project: she has injected herself with horse blood plasma. The ultimate goal is to explore trans-species relationships: the project was more artistic and sentimental-oriented than pure science applications. The theoretical part was done on a French lab for purification of horse blood and separation of all immunoglobulins. She prepared her body to accept different horse immunoglobulins over the course of several months before the real injection of horse blood plasma. This project was a success and this experience has provided data for many studies on immunoglobulin use in medicine.
One of the questions in the debate was the definition of life. The subject was introduced by a quote from biologist François Jacob "There are no life in labs". Marion Laval-Jeantet expressed two things: first, definition of life is at the center of bioartists' work. Secondly, different artists' visions create different definitions. So there is not a consensual definition of live nowadays. Other aspects of life definition were more developed on our Ethics part.
Paris Saclay curiostias3.JPG

Another developed point concerned relations between humans and other living beings. Some participants said that ethical committees unconsciously used an artificial hierarchy of living beings: some of them are placed before others without any biological or scientific basis. An explanation would be of psychological order: we feel closer to animals than bacteria because animals can react to stimuli and show reactions which can be similar to human feelings. We thus set up a better legislation to protect animals.