Team:ETH Zurich/expresults/rr

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
(Riboregulators)
(Riboregulators)
Line 13: Line 13:
-
First, the experiments were conducted with cells transformed with two different pPaB plasmids. These plasmids contained either the pBR322 origin (pMB1) or the p15A origin, which yielded a stable two-plasmid system with about 15-20 copies per plasmid and cell (medium-copy). Also, exactly the published riboregulator sequences were used in the the first place to have a positive control for functionality. This is important, because the original riboregulator sequence includes two forbidden restriction sites (EcoRI and XbaI). Second, the restriction sites were removed by two different approaches: a) multiple site-directed mutagenesis, b) blunting and ligation (Klenow and T4 DNA polymerase). Afterwards, the functionality of the construct was again tested to approve that no severe loss-of-function occurred due to the site-removal. In a third step, the construct was transferred into the [http://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB1C3 pSB1C3] backbone (pMB1 origin, high copy number of 100-300) to be in line with the [http://parts.igem.org/Help:Standards/Assembly BioBrick Standard]. Below, you can find the corresponding graphs in fig. 2 and fig. 3.
+
First, the experiments were conducted with cells transformed with two different pPaB plasmids. These plasmids contained either the pBR322 origin (pMB1) or the p15A origin, which yielded a stable two-plasmid system with about 15-20 copies per plasmid and cell (medium-copy). Also, exactly the published riboregulator sequences were used in the the first place to have a positive control for functionality. This is important, because the original riboregulator sequence includes two forbidden restriction sites (EcoRI and XbaI). Second, the restriction sites were removed by two different approaches: a) multiple site-directed mutagenesis, b) blunting and ligation (Klenow and T4 DNA polymerase). Afterwards, the functionality of the construct was again tested to approve that no severe loss-of-function occurred due to the site-removal. In a third step, the construct was transferred into the [http://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB1C3 pSB1C3] backbone (pMB1 origin, high copy number of 100-300) to be in line with the [http://parts.igem.org/Help:Standards/Assembly BioBrick Standard]. Below, you can find the corresponding graphs in fig. 2 and fig. 3, respectively.
-
In more detail, we have characterized promoters of the three quorum-sensing systems. These are pLux, pLas, and pRhl. To have a reference, we first measured the transfer functions of the non-regulated GFP (ref constructs), i.e. the amount of fluorescence in dependence of the inducer concentration present. Next, we repeated the experiments with the corresponding riboregulated constructs (ref constructs) once with and without the forbidden restriction sites.
+
In more detail, we have characterized promoters of the three quorum-sensing systems. These are [http://2014.igem.org/Team:ETH_Zurich/data#Used_and_Characterized_Pre-Existing_Parts pLux, pLas, and pRhl]. To have a reference, we first measured the transfer functions with a non-regulated RBS in front of sfGFP, i.e. the amount of fluorescence in dependence of the inducer concentration present. Next, we repeated the experiments with the corresponding riboregulated constructs once with and without the forbidden restriction sites.
-
 
+

Revision as of 10:22, 17 October 2014

Riboregulators

As many former iGEM teams have encountered unwanted basal expression of their genes of interest (goi) due to promoter leakiness (ETH2013, Groningen2012 amongst others), we investigated this severe obstacle to tightly controllable systems. We looked into the available literature and found with riboregulators a promising approach to challenge the issue of leakiness[32]. In addition, we chose this approach, to study and characterize such regulators combined with quorum sensing modules and make the resulting parts available for the iGEM community in the Registry of Standard Biological Parts.


The riboregulator systems include two parts: 1) a cis-repressed RBS in front of the goi, and 2) a co-expressed trans-activating RNA. 


To characterize this system for reliable cell-to-cell communication, we combined the riboregulator part with promoters of the quorum-input-sensing systems used by our team (LuxI/LuxR, LasI/LasR, and RhlI/RhlR). In our final gene circuit, the riboregulators were intended for the control of integrases. However, to have an easily quantifiable output, we used GFP as our riboregulated goi and measured the output fluorescence with a Tecan plate reader. This approach is described below in the figure 1.


Fig.1 Characterization of the riboregulator system. First, a defined amount of the incoming signal molecule 3OC6-HSL binds to LuxR. After dimerization, the complex binds to its corresponding promoter pLux. Both, the trans-activator(taR12y) and the cis-repressor (crR12y) together with superfolder green fluorecent protein (sfGFP), are under control of pLux. Upon induction with LuxR/3OC6-HSL, both are transcribed simultaneously and the taR12y (key symbol) opens up the crR12y sequence (lock) in front of the sfGFP mRNA. This enables translation and sfGFP production (left-hand side). Low transcription (leakiness) gives only small concentrations of mRNA, as a result 'lock' (cis-repressor) and 'key' (trans-activator) structures do not encounter each other and the translation is not enabled (right-hand side).


First, the experiments were conducted with cells transformed with two different pPaB plasmids. These plasmids contained either the pBR322 origin (pMB1) or the p15A origin, which yielded a stable two-plasmid system with about 15-20 copies per plasmid and cell (medium-copy). Also, exactly the published riboregulator sequences were used in the the first place to have a positive control for functionality. This is important, because the original riboregulator sequence includes two forbidden restriction sites (EcoRI and XbaI). Second, the restriction sites were removed by two different approaches: a) multiple site-directed mutagenesis, b) blunting and ligation (Klenow and T4 DNA polymerase). Afterwards, the functionality of the construct was again tested to approve that no severe loss-of-function occurred due to the site-removal. In a third step, the construct was transferred into the pSB1C3 backbone (pMB1 origin, high copy number of 100-300) to be in line with the BioBrick Standard. Below, you can find the corresponding graphs in fig. 2 and fig. 3, respectively.


In more detail, we have characterized promoters of the three quorum-sensing systems. These are pLux, pLas, and pRhl. To have a reference, we first measured the transfer functions with a non-regulated RBS in front of sfGFP, i.e. the amount of fluorescence in dependence of the inducer concentration present. Next, we repeated the experiments with the corresponding riboregulated constructs once with and without the forbidden restriction sites.


To conclude, we found an about 60-fold reduced basal GFP expression and an increased signal-to-noise ratio of about 6-fold when using our riboregulator construct, as compared to a non-regulated reference RBS (B0034). These results are summarized in figure 2. Finally, the BioBrick conform module was confirmed to show no loss-of-funtion. However, the sensitivity towards the inducer was slightly reduced (see figure 3).

Fig. 2 Improved signal-to-noise ratio and decreased basal GFP expression (leakiness) due to the use of a riboregulator in combination with a quorum-sensing module. The fluorescence per OD600 is shown for the LuxR-system with a complete riboregulator over an inducer-range of 10-13 M to 10-5 M (dashed, light blue). An incomplete riboregulator without the trans-activator shows the expected reduced sensitivity towards the inducer (dark blue). As a reference, a system with a non-regulated RBS (BBa_B0034) is shown (light blue). Data points are mean values of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation.
Fig. 3 Confirmation of the improved signal-to-noise ratio and decreased basal GFP expression (leakiness) due to the use of a riboregulator without (w/o) EcoRI and XbaI restriction sites in combination with a quorum-sensing module. The fluorescence per OD600 is shown for the LuxR-system with an unchanged riboregulator (dashed, light blue) and a regulator with a changed sequence due to EcoRI and XbaI restriction site removal. The inducer range covers 10-13 M to 10-5 M. As a reference, a system with a non-regulated RBS (BBa_B0034) is shown (light blue). Data points are mean values of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation.