Bronze medal criteria

Team registration

Done

Complete Judging form

Due Date : October 17^th

Team Wiki

Work in progress

Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree.

Jamboree, here we come!

The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services.

Done

Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).

Work in progress

Silver medal criteria

Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected.

Work in progress

Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry.

Work in progress

Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry (submissions must adhere to the iGEM Registry guidelines).

Work in progress

iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted.

Work in progress

Gold medal criteria

Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry.

Work in progress

Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.

Done

iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). We encourage thoughtful and creative approaches, and those that draw on past Policy & Practice (formerly Human Practices) activities.

Work in progress