Team:EPF Lausanne/Judging

From 2014.igem.org

Revision as of 16:38, 15 October 2014 by Robert Baldwin (Talk | contribs)

JUDGING

Judging form

The judging form can be found here.

Medal criteria

Criterion Achieved? Link
Team registration EPF_Lausanne
Complete judging form Judging form
Team Wiki Wiki
Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
The description of each project must clearly attribute work done by the students and distinguish it from work done by others, including host labs, advisors, instructors, sponsors, professional website designers, artists, and commercial services. Attributions
Document at least one new standard BioBrick Part or Device used in your project/central to your project and submit this part to the iGEM Registry. BBa_K1486001BBa_K1486005BBa_K1486001BBa_K1486012BBa_K1486015
Experimentally validate that at least one new BioBrick Part or Device of your own design and construction works as expected. BBa_K1486008
Document the characterization of this part in the “Main Page” section of that Part’s/Device’s Registry entry. BBa_K1486008
Submit this new part to the iGEM Parts Registry BBa_K1486002
iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted. Safety Page
Improve the function OR characterization of an existing BioBrick Part or Device (created by another team or your own institution in a previous year), enter this information in the Registry. BBa_K1486045
Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). Safety Page

Microfluidics medal criteria

Criterion Achieved? Link
Team registration EPF_Lausanne
Complete judging form Judging form
Team Wiki Wiki
Present a poster and a talk at the iGEM Jamboree
Demonstrate the implementation of any fluidic system. Document via video, images, and text how you fabricated and tested any milli-, micro- or nano-fluidic system. ???
Document and submit your fluidic system to the "Metafluidics" repository of device and hardware designs. microfluidic parts
iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Articulate at least one question encountered by your team, and describe how your team considered the(se) question(s) within your project. Include attributions to all experts and stakeholders consulted. Safety Page
Demonstrate the implementation of a novel fluidic system. This system can be a variation of an existing published system, with novel areas including optimized device geometries, integration of different functional modules (e.g. on-chip mixer and incubator), improved "world-to-chip" interfaces, improved controller hardware, or software. microfluidics parts
Document what you consider the novel features are compared to previous work. Note this does not require demonstration of biological function. Use an existing fluidic system to miniaturize an established biological process (e.g. PCR) or characterize an existing BioBrick Part or Device. Document any biological protocols performed utilizing your fluidic system. Compare biological protocols conducted on-chip against standard bench top techniques. Microfluidics Notebook
Utilizing your novel fluidic system, characterize or improve the function of an existing BioBrick Part or Device. Document any biological protocols performed utilizing your microfluidic system. Compare biological protocols conducted on-chip against standard bench top techniques. Upload data collected to the page of the part(s) used on the Registry of Standard Biological Parts via experience page/contribution system. Microfluidics Notebook
Utilizing any fluidic system, characterize a new BioBrick Part or Device. Document any biological protocols performed utilizing your microfluidic system. Compare biological protocols conducted on-chip against standard bench top techniques. Upload data collected to the page of the part(s) used on the Registry of Standard Biological Parts via experience page/contribution system. BBa_K1486002
Help any registered iGEM team from another school or institution by, for example, characterizing a part, debugging a construct, or modeling or simulating their system.
iGEM projects involve important questions beyond the bench, for example relating to (but not limited to) ethics, sustainability, social justice, safety, security, or intellectual property rights. Describe an approach that your team used to address at least one of these questions. Evaluate your approach, including whether it allowed you to answer your question(s), how it influenced the team’s scientific project, and how it might be adapted for others to use (within and beyond iGEM). Safety Page

Sponsors