Team:Goettingen/project overview/project drylab

From 2014.igem.org

(Difference between revisions)
Line 51: Line 51:
-
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8e/Goettingen-Drylab-graphic.jpg" target="1"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8e/Goettingen-Drylab-graphic.jpg" width="700" /></a><center><br /><p align = "justify">Figure:Depicting the procedure for Homology modeling: All peptides were cloned inside a scaffold (B1 domain of protein G from <i>Streptococcus aureus</i>. The peptides were short enough to be modeled as an internal loop by loop refinement; however, these structures should only be considered as a working model, since we don't have direct crystallographic data.</p></center><br /><br />
+
<a href="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8e/Goettingen-Drylab-graphic.jpg" target="1"><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/8/8e/Goettingen-Drylab-graphic.jpg" width="700" /></a><center><br /><p align = "justify"><b>Figure:</b>Depicting the procedure for Homology modeling: All peptides were cloned inside a scaffold (B1 domain of protein G from <i>Streptococcus aureus</i>. The peptides were short enough to be modeled as an internal loop by loop refinement; however, these structures should only be considered as a working model, since we don't have direct crystallographic data.</p></center><br /><br />
<hr>
<hr>
<br /><br />
<br /><br />

Revision as of 17:16, 19 September 2014

9/15



Dry lab



Homology modelling

We modeled the 3D structure of our peptide-containing scaffolds (domain B1 of protein G from Staphylococcus aureus) by homology modelling. We used Modeller library to accomplish that; since the peptide is about 20-25 amino acid residues long, it can be modeled as a loop inside the B1 domain scaffold for which there are already a number of 3D structures available at the Protein Data Bank.



Figure:Depicting the procedure for Homology modeling: All peptides were cloned inside a scaffold (B1 domain of protein G from Streptococcus aureus. The peptides were short enough to be modeled as an internal loop by loop refinement; however, these structures should only be considered as a working model, since we don't have direct crystallographic data.






References


  1. 1. N. Eswar, M. A. Marti-Renom, B. Webb, M. S. Madhusudhan, D. Eramian, M. Shen, U. Pieper, A. Sali. Comparative Protein Structure Modeling With MODELLER. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Supplement 15, 5.6.1-5.6.30, 2006.

  2. 2. M.A. Marti-Renom, A. Stuart, A. Fiser, R. Sánchez, F. Melo, A. Sali. Comparative protein structure modeling of genes and genomes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 291-325, 2000.

  3. 3. A. Sali & T.L. Blundell. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815, 1993.

  4. 4. A. Fiser, R.K. Do, & A. Sali. Modeling of loops in protein structures, Protein Science 9. 1753-1773, 2000.

9/15